Transhumanism and biohacking are closely related concepts. Both are centered around the idea of improving human health. However, it can’t be defined as one or the other.
A common denominator between transhumanism and biohacking is the focus on personal enhancement. Both spheres are motivated by altruism, as in the case of biohacking. A person with biohacking interests might experiment on organisms in his garage, or may attend a Genspace class that teaches people how to make furniture out of fungi or paper out of kombucha. In a similar vein, some people in the transhumanist movement might use their own bodies to manipulate the environment.
Among the two, biohacking is driven by a desire to improve human performance and improve one’s life. The biohacker’s goal is to achieve a more efficient and productive life. For example, a biohacker might insert magnets into his fingers. A coil of wire activates the magnets, which can detect distance. By manipulating the magnets, a biohacker can detect distances.
The biohacker’s approach to the problem has a long history. The term “biohacking” is rooted in the emerging culture of early technology adopters. It is based on transhumanism, which is the belief that it is possible and desirable to fundamentally alter the human body. Its roots date back to J. B. S. Haldane’s book, “Daedalus: Science and the Future”.
Despite the similarities in their approaches, biohackers are not typically considered transhumanists. Most biohackers do not identify as transhumanists, and they do not generally identify with most of their tenets. Their only commonality is the pursuit of human enhancement. The focus of biohackers is often on urgent personal enhancement rather than future-oriented technology.
In terms of ethics, transhumanists have been at the forefront of advancing technology. They have a unique viewpoint, which differs from that of the majority of biohackers. They believe that the goal of biohacking is to improve human life, and that modifying the body can help them achieve this goal. They are advocates of Morphological and Cognitive Liberty, two concepts that should not be confused with the rights of other individuals.
The transhumanist movement has long championed the rights of biohackers. They have promoted “Cognitive Liberty” and “Morphological Freedom”, which are two key terms for “human beings” in the context of biohacking. While these two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, these terms have no corresponding legal definition. The concept of cognitive freedom is important to the movement and has been called a core value in biohacking.
Both biohacking and transhumanism have their benefits and drawbacks. While both are focused on human enhancement, biohackers typically don’t identify with most transhumanist tenets. The intersectional area between the two spheres is human enhancement, and biohacking emphasizes immediate personal enhancement, practical improvements, and the present over speculative future-centricity. The key difference is the motivation behind biohacking and transhumanism, which is based on science, philosophy, and practice.
Biohackers vary in their motivations. Some, such as Moon Ribas, have had health issues for years and use biohacking techniques to cure himself. Others, like immortalists, seek to create a species of cyborgs. Still others, such as pragmatists, hope to help the sick and disabled by developing new treatments. Many biohackers have attempted to implant magnetic fields in their fingertips to achieve “magnetic vision”. The benefit of magnetic vision is debatable, but implanting magnets into the fingertips is the first step toward a cure.
The motivation for biohackers differ. Some biohackers are driven by a desire to improve themselves and their quality of life. They experiment with various methods such as diet and exercise, and take supplements to boost their abilities. They also conduct personal experiments to enhance their relaxation and focus. Some even use these techniques to enhance their spirituality. Thus we can conclude that if biohacking and transhumanism are incompatible for a biohacker, he will choose biohacking.